.

Council Passes new Automated Waste Contract 5-1

The contract is estimated to cost the city $1.7 million per year in year one, not including the $958,000 for the carts in the first year.

Sixty-four gallon trash and recycling carts and automated trash collection service is coming to Newport after a 5-1 City Council vote to approve a new contract with Waste Management.

City Councilor Mike Farley, also a lawyer, abstained from the vote because he represents Waste Management as a client.

City Councilor Kate Leonard expressed reservations about the new contract because many Newporters are happy with the existing service and won't be so happy when they find out they'll need to buy a sticker to get bulky waste removed — a provision under the new contract. That includes getting rid of a small chair or table for a fee of $20.

"In the end, you can find things sitting on the street and that's where they'll end up if people don't want to pay the fee," Leonard said.

Another concern raised before the vote was the size of the bins, which have double the capacity of the standard 32-gallon trash barrel most people visualize and can be cumbersome, especially for the city's elderly.

"We need a viable option for people who want smaller bins," said City Councilor Marco T. Camacho, noting a resident can purchase a smaller bin after the initial citywide distribution of new bins later this year — for a fee.

But William R. Riccio, Director of Public Services, said there will be residents who have personal assistance and in some situations, people can get a 32-gallon bin. But to keep things simple and avoid future problems, distributing 64-gallon bins to everyone keeps things standard and uniform "across the board."

Riccio explained that every house is assigned a bin and the bin stays with the house. There could be a propensity of problems down the road if a house is sold and the new owners find they'd rather have a 64 gallon instead of a 32 gallon one, he said. The concern is by "putting the option out there," things could get not-so-uniform fairly fast.

Waste Management — the sole bidder to respond to the city's request for proposals — will provide on-street litter barrel collection service that will bring 45 new solar powered trash and recycling stations to the city.

Yard waste collection and roll-off and dumpster on-call service for schools and city buildings would remain unchanged.

The contract is estimated to cost the city $1.7 million per year in year one, not including the $958,000 for the carts in the first year. 

According to figures released by the city earlier this year, the total cost for the contract over the five year term would be about $6.7 million.

Advocates for cart-based collection tout the bins' effectiveness at keeping rodents at bay thanks to attached lids that simultaneously prevent litter caused by wind and scavengers. 

Underlying any new initiative is a desire on the part of city officials to boost recycling rates. Cities and towns across Rhode Island are trying to meet  the 35 percent recycling rate goal set by the state. The idea is to not only increase recycling rates and reduce the amount of trash that ends up in the Central Landfill in Johnston, but also to save money. The higher the city’s recycling rate, the lower the tipping fee, or rate that a community pays to dispose of trash.

Last year, the city had a recycling rate of 23.5 percent – the highest it ever seen, but that’s far from the 35 percent goal – and well below the 25- to 29 percent it must meet to start getting incentive discounts on the tipping rate.

The contract is part of a combined service bid between the city and the town of Middletown but no bidder responded to the combined bid proposal, Howington said. As a result, Newport negotiated the terms of the contract with Waste Management individually.

The contract will run from July 1 of this year to June 30 of 2019.

The rollout of the carts and new pay-as-you-throw sticker system for bulky waste will be gradual to allow Waste Management time to buy equipment and reorganize its services. It also gives the city time for community outreach and education.

Charles W April 15, 2014 at 11:59 AM
Still don't quite understand how the new buckets are going to increase the rate of recycling.
Richard Walega April 15, 2014 at 04:41 PM
There are several issues here. First is the sole bid by Waste Management, which could have been thrown out but wasn't. The City is reported to have negotiated a contract lasting 5 years. How does this contract stack up against similar hauling contracts in other parts of Rhode Island as far as $/ton, tipping fees, etc.? Did this figure into the negotiation? Second is the addition $1M barrel cost. Wasn't collection in the bid. Why is the city obligated to pay this sum? Why is it one size fits all when there are very dense historic neighborhoods with little side or rear yard space? Why green and yellow: if these are Newport's barrels Newport should select a barrel color more in keeping with its historic nature...brown or gray would do. It seems we're buying into the WM corporate colors. From whom are we buying these? If the sum is already known it would seem there's been a deal struck between WM and Newport: I hope I am wrong. Bidding for barrels will only help reduce the costs. And bidding can provide the size variation that's desperately needed for old folks and historic neighborhoods. There are many issues that require answers. I'm afraid the city's residents have been caught by surprise with this contract. There needs to be much more discussion, and the city needs to LISTEN to taxpayer concerns rather than dictate how this contract will unfold.
Tom April 15, 2014 at 11:26 PM
Farley for Mayor.....
Kahuna Hookele April 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM
Farley recused himself from this decision, you can bet he'll distance himself from the derision. The barrels are too big, the city council made yet another poor decision. We don't have to put up with this, we don't have to accept these out scaled, oversized trash containers, and we don't have to accept another inane and poorly researched decision from our city council. Time for every single one of the miscreants to be voted out of office.
Larry Gotch April 17, 2014 at 02:24 PM
I have been thinking more about this. The new trucks will lift the large containers only once instead of two times for the smaller containers. Very efficient. Collection could be twice as fast and require less labor. Waste management wins, the City wins, we loose, and some jobs may be lost. How do we proceed if the oversized trash containers are untenable? It might work, but then again one size may not fit all.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »