Naval Station Newport Proposes 12 Potential Wind Turbine Locations
Following an Evaluation Assessment, the end result could be different areas with potentially different size wind turbines.
Naval Station Newport held an open house at Middletown High School this Thursday for residents to learn more about the proposed development of 12 wind turbines across the island. Several tables were set up with experts at each for attendees to walk through.
Captain Joseph Voboril, Commanding Officer of Naval Station Newport, greeted guests, listened to concerned residents, and explained the Environmental Assessment for the development of wind energy facilities at Naval Station Newport. Attendees were encouraged to write down questions and feedback to drop into boxes.
Naval Station Newport is one of the largest consumers of electricity in the state of Rhode Island, spending an average of $12 million annually. The base load electrical consumption is approximately nine megawatts and the proposed wind turbine project will potentially produce up to nine megawatts, which is 26 percent of the current annual electrical consumption. The turbine project would reportedly result in at least a $3 million in savings.
Naval Station Newport must become more self-sufficient and maximize the Navy’s ability to meet or exceed renewable power supply goals mandated in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Executive Order 13423.
The wind turbines would be constructed at some combination of 12 sites on Naval Station Newport, from Portsmouth down to Newport. Joanne Galuska, Deputy Public Works Officer of Naval Station Newport, said the end result could be a couple of different areas with potentially different size wind turbines.
“We’ve done extensive research regarding these 12 proposed sites,” Galuska said. “The space around the turbines needs to be 1.5 times its height, and the Federal Aviation Administration limits the height as well.”
The assessment, which Captain Voboril initiated, is in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is expected to be completed in September 2011 and the assessment will be one of the determining factors. In addition to compliance with the FAA, other criteria for placement and sizes include "efficient and cost effective construction and maintenance, no significant adverse impact on natural resources, cultural resources, protected species, human environment or socioeconomics of the region, and geotechnical requirements for structural considerations."
Residents who attended the event had several concerns, mostly because they did not want to be able to see the turbines from their homes. However, many studies will be completed that also include a Bird and Bat Biological Survey, a Noise and Shadow Flicker Study, and a Marine Mammal Observation Study.
Captain Voboril said the project has been in the works for about three years.
“It’s taken this long to come to this point, in fact my predecessor was the first to begin the research," he said. "But we’re excited to be here."
It will be another couple of years before the turbines are actually constructed. Naval Station Newport still needs to fund and design the project as well.
William F Horan
8:32 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012
It is time for the USN to abandon this overreach & encroachment on Aquidneck Island Communities once again. . Yes, an ill advised and dangerous USN Newport 12 each Wind Turbine generator scheme on the West Side of Aquidneck Island. This makes no economic sense and is a mirror image of the failed national energy policy and a looting of the Treasury. Finally, this scheme is an assault on the already encumbered RI Public Utilities installation base. Yes, WTG are not compatible with the operating profile for the areas in place generating facilities and WTG will significantly stress and shorten the conventional installations life. WTG are based on Voodoo economics and economic terrorism of the tax payer. What we have in RI is very high utility rates because the rates are artificially elevated to service the welfare wealth redistribution industry and second support the bunko renewable green energy political cult of true believers. The proposed WTG sites are land that long ago should have been returned to the towns for both private and public use.