Boy Scouts To Reconsider Ban on Gay Members
The Boy Scouts of America could reverse its decades-old ban on allowing homosexual members and leaders as early as next week, leaving the decision to local troops.
Just seven months after the Boy Scouts of America reaffirmed its decades-old ban on admitting gay members and leaders, the organization said it could reverse that policy as early as next week.
Scout officials announced on Monday that the organization is considering amending its policy against homosexual participation in favor of allowing local troops to decide on their own, NBC News reports.
If the policy change is approved at next week's national executive board meeting the ban on gay membership would be eliminated from the scout's rules.
"The chartered organizations that oversee and deliver scouting would accept membership and select leaders consistent with their organization’s mission, principles or religious beliefs,” Deron Smith, a spokesman for the Boy Scouts’ national organization told NBC News on Monday.
Tiverton scout leader and Town Councilor William P. Gerlach said the news was positive, but was discouraged that the Boy Scouts chose to sidestep such a divisive and important social issue.
"I think this is a step in the right direction and it's a positive development, but I think the national organization can do more," said Gerlach. "They have basically absolved themselves of the responsibility and pushed the decision on whether or not to admit gay and lesbian scouts and leaders onto the local organizations that sponsor the local units."
As far as Tiverton's scout organizations go, homosexuality is - and has been - a non-issue. Gerlach said his cub scouts troop has never had an issue with homosexuality, but added that he discussed the national Boy Scouts' organization ban with other local scout leaders and all agreed that sexuality was irrelevant to participation.
"Our local unit remains committed to an inclusive program on all levels," said Gerlach.
While the New York times reported that scout officials offered no timeline on making the formal decision, most other media outlets are anticipating a decision after discussion on the issue at next week's national executive board meeting.
Activists on both sides of the issue spoke out on Monday on the unintended consequences of leaving the decision on whether or not to allow gays up to individual scouting troops. The New York Times reported that supporters of the ban feared the Boy Scouts' softened approach could undermine the organization's legacy of producing great, moral leaders. Equality activists worried the piecemeal approach would encourage discrimination in some troops.
The battle to end the ban on gay members and leaders in the Boy Scouts began decades ago, but recently regained momentum as a result of public and private backlash when the scouts reaffirmed their policy position in 2012. That same policy endured a Supreme Court trial in 2000.
What's your opinion on allowing gay members and leaders in the Boy Scouts? Do you think Boy Scouts' headquarters should issue a more definitive policy change allowing homosexuals? What will be the repercussions of allowing individual units to ban or allow gay members? Tell us in the comments below.
bimbels
11:37 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I think it's a start but it still allows discrimination, now depending on the locals. Not good enough.
nagaer40
12:44 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
A person who is sexually attracted to members of the same sex should not be allowed to mentor and influence young boys.
nptresident
1:11 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Why don't you educate yourself on such matters before you say idiotic things. Homosexuals do not molest at any greater rate than heterosexuals. Another neanderthal to add to the list.....
nagaer40
1:19 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Who said anything about molestation. Get your mind out of the gutter nptresident.
nptresident
2:55 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Your statement implied that gay people are attracted to children. What are you afraid of? Do you think gay men talk about sex all day long and are attracted to anything that comes along? Do you actually believe that gay men would talk to kids about sex any more than a hetero one?
nagaer40
3:30 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I believe that a scout leader should act as a mentor and teach children about morality and family values. Since it is physically impossible for a gay person to naturally have a family. They are not capable of acting as a teacher and passing on life experiences as a father. I don't think having this reasonable opinion is worthy of being called a neanderthal.
nptresident
12:54 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
So in your world, gay people should not become teachers? What is it about homosexuals that makes you think they have no morals and can not be mentors? I would like my children to be mentored by people who are smart, funny, kind and compassionate. Heterosexuals are not the only ones capable of those traits. And those whose views are small minded and prejudiced are the last ones who should be a child's mentor. Sex has nothing to do with mentoring children. Alas, your head is in the gutter.
Taxpayer
10:13 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Boy scouts of America has always been (and has a right to be) an ultra conservative (para military) organization. Is this a response to receive federal funds? Maybe they should ask for support from like minded civic groups before compromising on their principles.
nagaer40
8:11 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
I will not be forced do accept the twisted radical idiology of the progressives. When people refuse to plug into the progressive brain they are called bigots or racists. If that is the best you can do than bring it on.
nptresident
1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
And what would you call someone whose lack of tolerance and information makes someone say that certain people should not be acceptable in society?